The next story.
Recession, terrorism, war, and now an apparently <a href="http://www.nature.com/nsu/030324/030324-11.html" title="Nature magazine article on SARS">unstoppable and <a href="http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/topstories/story/0,4386,180311,00.html" title="Doctor who identified SARS died">deadly <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1022-994612.html?tag=fd_top" title="News story about HP's reaction to SARS">airborne virus called <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/index.htm" title="CDC page on SARS">SARS is <a href="http://espn.go.com/nhl/news/2003/0329/1531200.html" title="ESPN article about hockey players at risk of SARS">sweeping the world. I'm ready for some good nows now, please. The story still seems to be in the margins, at least in my part of the world, but I think it might start to push to war off of the front page in the upcoming weeks. The story is popping up in the blogs I read now, particularly Joi Ito's and The Agonist. There are <a href="http://www.naplesnews.com/03/03/perspective/d922370a.htm" title="Michael Fumento criticizes the panic">some who think the panic is a <a href="http://www.robertlyons.co.uk/weblog/2003_03_30_archive.shtml#91644549" title="Blogger Rob Lyons comments on Fumento's article">bit overblown and I hope they are right.