« del.icio.us links... | Main | The talk went well »

JavaOne web framework smack-down



Are there really going to be any smack-downs? I'm betting it's gonna be pretty mild. I'll blog the comments that provoke the smack-down bell. Webwork - Jason Carerra

  • "We're not desgined by a committee"
  • "You have to join the JCP and press the spec meat"
  • "You have to have a tool to deal with the 18 JSF configuration files"
  • "JSF, which hasn't been out for a year, is telling us about maintainability?"
  • "Yeah, use the JSF extensibility to create a spyware component"
  • "(Geary's mailbox is so full because) people are confused by MyFaces"
Struts Shale - David Geary
  • "JSF is a lot better Struts and a better Webwork"
  • "Struts is old school, get over it" (he asked for the bell, but didn't get it)
Wicket - Martin Dashorst
  • "No framework makes it as easy to create components as Wicket"
  • "With Wicket you only need to know the extends keyword"
Tapestry - Howard Lewis-Ship
  • "It's not Struts++"
JSF - Ed Burns
  • (too nice to provoke the bell even once)
  • "You don't care about maintainability, use Struts" (shoulda gotten the bell, but didn't)
Audience
  • To David Geary: "Why did you steal Springs web flow?"
OK, I missed a couple, but you get the idea. Those guys were waaaay too nice.
Comments:

[Trackback] In my quest for more feedback on the Web Framework Smackdown, I've found this blog entry . I don't agree with the author that it was too nice. In my opinion the idea was to convince people to leave the current MVC or JSP/servlet paradigm behind and cr...

Posted by A Wicket Diary on July 01, 2005 at 11:48 PM EDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

« del.icio.us links... | Main | The talk went well »

Welcome

This is just one entry in the weblog Blogging Roller. You may want to visit the main page of the weblog

Related entries

Below are the most recent entries in the category Java, some may be related to this entry.