« Re: and Happiness | Main | More on the balancin... »

Warning: disturbance in the source

Matt Raible: Upgrading Roller and Happiness. I've been meaning to upgrade this site to use the latest Roller CVS source for quite some time (about a month), but haven't got around to it. However, Dave and Lance have been checking in enhancements like mad lately, so I don't know if it's such a good idea.

Yep, now is not the time to grab Roller from CVS and upgrade your Roller-based weblog. I'm in slash-and-burn, rip-and-replace, and code-away-the-night mode, and upgrading Roller right now is not the path to happiness. Wait a couple of days until things settle down a bit.

Matt also has some cool ideas about the Rollers comments feature, which still needs some work. He also wonders what defines Roller 1.0. That is a good question.

I like the philosophy of under promise and over deliver, and in this case I think that means that we should announce plans only for the next release, which in our case is Roller 0.9.7. I also like the philosophy of release early and release often, and in this case I think that means we need to try to polish up a 0.9.7 release in the next month or so.

I'm not sure exactly what features we need in Roller to call it Roller 1.0, but I do think that we will know when we are there. What features do you think are must-haves for Roller 1.0?

Comments:

I think it's good to go with a 1.0 right now! It's got way more features (and less bugs) than a traditional 1.0 application. We can always do a bunch of 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, etc. Why does the Java community insist on having 1.x versions of everying (i.e. Struts 1.1, Java 1.4)? I'm no versioning expert, but I think folks are more inclined to use a 4.0 product, just from experience.

Posted by Matt Raible on January 05, 2003 at 06:58 PM EST #

I had no idea you were such a marketeer. Forget 1.0, lets call it Roller Turbo 8000 LXi ;-)

Posted by Dave Johnson on January 05, 2003 at 09:04 PM EST #

I think open source developers are generally extremely reluctant to go to version 1.0. Usually it's "Features X, Y and Z need to be done", but when you dig you'll find that X, Y and Z were first proposed around version 0.50 or so. :-) In general I think it's part of the perfectionist tendency rearing its head. For me, if a project has been around for some time with regular updates I have zero problem using it -- version 1.0 is just one higher than 0.99...

Posted by Chris Winters on January 08, 2003 at 02:46 AM EST #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

« Re: and Happiness | Main | More on the balancin... »

Welcome

This is just one entry in the weblog Blogging Roller. You may want to visit the main page of the weblog

Related entries

Below are the most recent entries in the category Roller, some may be related to this entry.