Dave Johnson on open web technologies, social software and software development
« XORM - for GPL apps... | Main | Monday quickies »
Scott from Atlassian wrote to tell me that OFBiz-EE can be used in all four of the persistence scenarios that I discussed yesterday. He wrote:
You have your JavaBeans already, you then need to create an entitymodel.xml file to represent your entities (which will then CRUD the relevant database tables), and you can use the API to store your changes to the database. However, the storing is not automatic - you would have to write the code yourself. [Scott from Atlassian]
But if you have to write the storage code yourself, can you really say that OFBiz-EE supports this scenario? I don't think so. OFBiz-EE takes a very different approach, not a bad approach, but a different approach.
I think OFBiz EE needs its own scenario - the generic-object scenario. I don't think it truly fits into any of the four scenarios that I listed. It does not really do anything to support the JavaBeans model (no introspection, no JavaBeans generation) and it does not do any code generation (except for the DDL, right?). So here is the new generic-object scenario that I have just added to the comparison to accomodate OFBiz-EE:
Generic-object: Start with a meta-data description of your desired database schema, generate DDL to create your database, and use a persistence API to store and retrieve generic data objects, with values stored as a hash of name-value pairs, to and from your database.
Dave Johnson in Java
02:09PM Oct 14, 2002
Comments [0]
Tags:
Java
This is just one entry in the weblog Blogging Roller. You may want to visit the main page of the weblog
Below are the most recent entries in the category Java, some may be related to this entry.