Open source Web 2.0
I've been following the new bubble hype-masters and it seems to me that, for a lot of folks, Web 2.0 is about enabling companies and investors to profit off of user created content, simpler programming models so that built-to-flip companies can throw up new sites fast and slicky-slick AJAX interfaces to lure investors and unsuspecting users to the shiny new services.
So Henri, you're right, Web 2.0 is not about having cool software to install on your own personal web server, it's about getting locked into services provided by and trusting your data to Web sites that you do not control. It doesn't have to be that way, of course, and perhaps I'm exaggerating a bit just for fun (and hits). But maybe we need a list of "the best open source Web 2.0 software" -- and it would include things like open source blog servers, wiki servers, photo galleries, content management systems, social bookmarking clones and etc. Where would you start looking for such software? Google for "open source web 2.0" and where do you end up? Lucky you Henri, you're already there.

Dave Johnson
in Blogging
• 🕒 08:36AM Jan 25, 2006
Tags:
Blogging
Posted by Migs on January 26, 2006 at 03:06 AM EST #
Posted by Weiqi Gao on January 26, 2006 at 11:52 AM EST #
Posted by An Adventure into Industry on January 26, 2006 at 01:07 PM EST #
Posted by chris hollander on January 26, 2006 at 02:44 PM EST #
Posted by Dave Johnson on January 26, 2006 at 03:02 PM EST #
Posted by Wes Felter on January 26, 2006 at 03:31 PM EST #
Posted by Dave Johnson on January 26, 2006 at 03:45 PM EST #
Posted by Michael Bernstein on January 26, 2006 at 06:17 PM EST #
Posted by topopardo on January 26, 2006 at 08:09 PM EST #
Posted by topopardo on January 26, 2006 at 08:10 PM EST #
Posted by john allsopp on January 26, 2006 at 10:12 PM EST #
Posted by Patrick Chanezon on February 07, 2006 at 06:50 PM EST #
Posted by Wes Felter on February 07, 2006 at 07:46 PM EST #
I don't know, may be because now it's too easy to roll out your own Web 2.0 application in a weekend using smaller components and frameworks (a.k.a Rails)?
The Open Source / Free web (1.0?) applications were mostly about a huge code base that you can download and setup at some premises no one can argue. But, how about having the full control over the code. Not modify the ones that you download, but rather build from scratch whatever you see serve the business requirements. After all, there is a "configuration" learning curve for most of these Web 1.0 applications.
I agree that it's hard to come up with a large set of features within a short period of time (did I say weekend), but, most of the quoted/reviewed/available Web 2.0 services are very easy to implement. The success of these services is all in the idea and the usability rather than the set of features it contains. I guess Rails and such are promoting a smaller code base (with no tyring setup configurations) vs. a large feature set with a code base that becomes more of a green monster.
Web 2.0 is the era of "start-building-something". It's the delivery of ideas rather than the delivery of code.
Sorry, trackback gave errors. Posted on my blog.
Posted by Tamer Salama on February 09, 2006 at 12:19 PM EST #