Blogging Roller

I've been exchanging emails with a developer who has integrated my old Relay-IRC chat client into his gaming web site. The guy doesn't understand the Mozilla Public License and I'm not sure I'm smart enough to explain it to him, but I tried just the same. Along the way, I came up with this.

Dave's dumbed-down explanation of open source licenses.

Here's what you're telling your downstream users when you pick one of the three levels of open source licenses:

• Level 1: Gimme credit (APL, BSD, MIT)
  You can use, modify and redistribute my code in your product but give me credit (actually, modern BSD doesn't even require credit).
  
• Level 2: Gimme fixes (MPL, CDDL, LGPL)
  You can use, modify and redistribute my code in your product but give me the source for any fixes you make to it.
  
• Level 3: Gimme it ALL! (GPL)
  You can use, modify and redistribute my code in your product but give me your entire product's  source code.

What do you think; is it too dumbed-down to be useful?

• Maven repo at Java.Net
  Eduardo notes that Java.Net now has a Maven repo
• eWEEK: 2005 top products include Solaris 10 and Java Studio Creator 2
  "My favorite product of this year is Solaris 10"
• InfoWorld's Most Innovative Server of 2006: Sun Fire T2000
  "winners represent the best products defining and often redefining, the role of IT"
• Meet the Swing Team, Part 1
  Romain Guy's Swing team member slideshow
• Meet the Swing Team, Part 2
  Romain Guy's Swing team member slideshow (continued)