JSF spec lead Ed Burns just pointed out that some of my Sun-internal comments about JSF have made it outside the firewall and into an issue on the JSF specification project:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, David M Johnson said:
I think the goal should be to make JSF applications RESTful by default, with proper use of GET and POST, i.e. only use POST when application data is changing, not for component state. Another goal should be clean, book-markable URLs that only carry path-info and parameters needed by the application logic.
That's easy and the default situation with Rails, Grails, Struts, etc. How hard would it be to redesign JSF along those lines? Would it require EJB2 -> EJB3 level changes to JSF?
I suspect work on JSF 2.0 is too far along for this kind of change now, but it's nice to hear that the idea of a truly RESTful JSF is at least under consideration.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright 2002-2007, David M Johnson (dave.johnson at rollerweblogger.org)
This is a personal weblog, I do not speak for my employer.

Buy now from Amazon.com
Or direct from Manning
| « December 2008 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
| Today | ||||||
Allen Gilliland
Anil Gangolli
Dan Axon
Danese Cooper
Film Babble Blog
Geertjan's Weblog
Henri Yandell
James Robertson
Jim Grisanzio
Josh Staiger
Linda Skrocki
Pat Chanezon
Rama
Ruby Sinreich
Simon Phipps
Tim Bray
Will Snow
Janne Jalkanen
Joe Gregorio
Matt Raible
Mike Cannon Brookes
Rafe Colburn
Sam Ruby
Simon Brown
My other sites